You can establish a link between the concerns of young Italians and the proposed future that Marchionne has offered the Fiat workers in our country? The most tragic protests by students and researchers of these weeks is not in the violence of the clashes or the drama of a precarious condition which has become a structural fact of so many lives but in the absence of a proposal fully biopolitics (in the sense that he had already developed in Foucauld lectures at the College de France in 1979-80) to the phenomena that should be reported.
There is, yes, the growing awareness that neither the colonization of the life time of work activities or by making the value of its resources, cognitive, emotional and social skills can provide, now and for the future, a return economically capable of meeting the minimum needs of reproduction cognitive capital of the subjects. And very often even the mere material autonomy is possible with the cognitive work that the Italian market offers. The
bios and psyche, given the inputs to all intents and purposes, put on the Italian market does not manage to create a favorable monetary exchange for the part that transfers them.
We can also see a contradiction that seems inabbissarsi the entire country's economic development: on the one hand you try to pay as little as possible to work reduced to a mere object of control, almost a zoon that you buy the force animal is not aware, many other cognitive subjectivity would like to work to output by making intangible value of their bios and their psyche find themselves in an economic environment that does not require enough, neither in quantity nor in quality, their contribution and then pay it ends up a little.
policy realizes the precariousness as if it were a problem to fix with any law or a little 'GDP growth does not grasping that it is instead the result of the crisis of the social model and Italian industry.
He is wrong so who thinks that the model of Marchionne is just a new model of industrial relations: a fortiori it will outline a model for the survival of an entire nation in the era of globalization. That the costs of this survival are to be allocated in society according to the logic of mere profitability in Marchionne is clear. But not to Italian politics, which is in favor or against on the basis of ideological schemes exceeded. The lives all right as a great revenge against the Italian left-wing unions, a symbolic act, as the success of the Thatcher on miners, capable of disarticulating the opponent in its social bases. The left, even when he sees clearly the links between political command and control of the company as Giorgio Cremaschi (in the recent The system of masters, from Berlusconi to Marchionne), stumbles into the mental mechanisms and terminologies backdated: use the term master recalls a time when two clear subjectivity contradicted in a national context.
Today Marchionne also every shift has to deal with transnational business logic that can be accepted or not, but little or no change. It is here that the political lives its crisis, its inability to develop responses to transnational models biocapitalistici crossing countries and continents. There is no question in Italy from the U.S. to import a compassionate welfare Calvinist-style welfare state in place of the compromise Fordist-Keynesian writes today on Republic Massimo Giannini, because the logic of the global value chain of a country in decline that Italy has to adapt to have less in terms of rights. Point.
And even this is a classic confrontation between labor-intensive production or (cognitive) capital intensive as in the knowledge there can be labor intensive activity that does not include a strong investment in intellectual capital of the entities that true. We start instead from the assumption that the two models, the Anglo-Saxon individualism and the knowledge economy touted by the European Union at least, they can not be applied to Italy and therefore must manage downsizing of economic and social rights of citizenship , a consequence of profitability of our country.
Marchionne has understood this and behaves in a consistent manner. Even the less aware of the union have understood this. They are opposed as they can but refer to the past is a way to evade the challenges of the present.
Talking about the knowledge economy in a national context that ends up having little effect, at least until it will develop a bio-politics can offer new spaces and new responses to the minds and bodies in check.
0 comments:
Post a Comment